Kunal v. State Of Haryana & ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-16285-2017 Date of decision: 08.08.2018 Kunal ..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Arjun Singh Yadav, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Despite the case having been called twice, the petitioner has gone un-represented.
Perusal of the file shows that on the last two dates also, the petitioner had gone un-represented. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that the petitioner or his counsel is no more interested in pursuing the instant petition.
Resultantly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. August 08, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2018.08.09 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document