Sushila Malik v. State Of Haryana




    
     

 Date of decision: 26th May, 2015  Sushila Malik  Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana  Respondent     !"  #
  #
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naveen Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.

 #
$

" Learned counsel for the petitioner has made statement before this Court withdrawing the present petition however, reserving his rights to rake up all these issues before the trial Court. Allowed to do so.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. The decision of the trial Court shall be purely on merits and shall not be influenced by any other orders passed by this Court or the trial Court.

 #
   %&$ 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.26 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court