Sushma Arora And ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS




   

 



 

  
 

      !"#$ $#% &$! '&(( )&$*!+ ,&$! !

#& -' ).#/% &$! &!0 )1&)*!+
2 34


 
2 2




 Present : Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Harsimrat Rai, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate for the respondents.





   
The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.72 dated 01.05.2015 registered under Sections 306 and 511 IPC at Police Station Sadar Amritsar District Amritsar and the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise (Annexure P32) arrived at between the parties. Report has been received from learned ACJM, Amritsar after statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. Learned ACJM has reported that the compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion. Learned ACJM has also sent copy of the statements of parties.

RAJ KUMAR 2016.01.12 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document


 

 



Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that petitioners are the only accused and respondents no.2 & 3 is the only aggrieved person in this FIR.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in




    

      



!

"#, approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in $





      

"

"

 , the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the petitioners.

Needless to say that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

  



 

  

  

  

  
   
RAJ KUMAR 2016.01.12 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document