Tata Aig General Insurance Company Ltd v. Kiran Goyal And ORS
-1-
Reserved on:- 12.12.2025
!"#"$#%&'
"#(
) )
*+",'&'
"#(
-) )
( ./ 0) 0 0
! "
!
#$ ! %&' $ ! % ( ) * +&&&+,&- ....
0
)
& "
/
!
! 0
1
*
10" ! 0
10" + 0 ! / * &3,&+,&3
0
0 4!
50 67 $ &))!
&8-- *
1
* 0 *
0 2 % &'
-2- ! &8 -, ,,,21 /* 9): / !
;
! 0/ <
10" 0!0 %& '2
10" / * &3,&+,&3
! $ &))! &8-- 0
0 ! !
/ % & '2 !
&8 -, ,,,21 / * 9):
! !
1 *
,(,-+,&( '
!
0" !;
! * 0 0 ! !
!
;
0
! =!0 000 / 0/
0 ( !
1
0 0 /
0
! 0
* ! 0
* 6.
Per contra, t !
10"
0 0 * 0 !
10" 0
* 0
! 0 * 3 !
* !
* 0
-30/ /1 0 - >60 $
! Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 2 0$*!&3& "$!4 ,5&5
6 * *
! ! ?30
!
" # $
% & #$
$ !
$ ' ()*+,
-+$'()*.,
./$ ' ()*0,
! !
$
1
$
$ 023 !
$ $
$
(,
"
4$ $ "
1 $ $
-4- $ $
$
$ 023 !
023
% $
$
' $ !
'
" '
* * * * * * 42.
# (., (
5$ "# # ,$
)6( )0-2 -) -0 ,$ $ 7')8 -/+2 $7')/+)+0 $7')0+/.2 $7'
)..).0 $ 7')+./02 $
$ $7'))0)00 $7'9 0//2 $7'8/)/0 7'0//82
8 >60 $
!National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 2
0 6 ! * $ &)) &)<1 &)-! &8-- !
*/
-547 @
! / A
B 4C7 $ !
/ /! B 47 /! 0 ! /
B 4@7 0 !/
!
! !
A *
B 4D7 !
/ ! !!! /
* "0B !1 !A
!"
/
?52. : conventional heads $
!
;
< 1 ; -0$222 !
$ ; )$22$222 ;)$22$222 !
;
= $ $
$
> " $
& : &
!$ " $
$ !
$
-6-
"
"
& $
" $ " ! 1 $ $ $ !
; )0$222$ ; .2$222 ; )0$222
? ' & ' "
&
)23
@ @ @ @ @ 59.3 $ 023
$ .2 $ +23$ .202
1 02/2
$ )03 :
!
59.4 1 ' (, !
$ .23
-7- .2
: -03 .202 )23
02/2
!
59.5 4
$
!
$
+2+-
A B
59.6.
A C
.-
59.7
59.8 ; $ $ $ !
; )0$222$;.2$222 ;)0$222
)23
&, >60 $
!,73, &#&!,+ #5$!,#%& "3*,#8 /9394&'
:5) ,#$
,3 ,+9,5 ;$;!$
,3 4;&!5 2 0
6 ! /0,!+, :&!3, 5$*!, !,#,8 0&4;9
0$*!,
*/ / !
E21 :# ? # F
<
-8- 1
$G G
G G$ G
G$ G
G
$ $ $$ $ $
$
!
-) ) Spousal consortium
'
G
$ $ $
$
G
-) - Parental consortium
$ G
$ $ $ $
$
G
-) + Filial consortium
: "
# $
$
#
7 ' H !
7
-9-
$ $
7A :
$
1
$ $
F
: : % #
% $
G G
F
< 1 $
$ ; .2$222
&& ! *
10"
4FGC#1&,)1+,&87! &+
! *
1 * *
0'( !
0 /
/! 1 * '( 8 &8
0 // 4DA 1(7
-10- &< !
! *
1 * * / /
!
/ !
!
>
B*
/ ! > C $/H // B !
0
!
/ ! * / &'
!
10" A
H1+ ** !
>
10"
A ;0 4 A
A@ 7*
!
*/ A 0 ! 47 ! 0
>
!
+,&<1&'4DA 1&(7B 47 A ! * / !
+,&'1&(4DA 1&37 +,&(1&)4DA 1&-7 &( 0 /
0 0
/ A /*
!
!
+,&'1&( !
0
/
!
A ! H1+
*
>* 0 " / A ! * / !
+,&(1&) 4DA 1&-7 * / ! &) C * A
0
! 0
!
I ,(,-+,&( !
+,&(1&)
-11- 0! "
!
0" ! / 0 "
/
0 >60 $ Nidhi Bhargava & Ors. Vs National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors. 2025 INSC 526 A !
0 * E)- I
$)- -226$ ;: -226'-229 $
$ ;
):
$-228 +)7 $-226
$ $;
2) 2.
-228+) 2+ -226$ '+) 2+ -226 +) 2+ -226 1
!;: -226'-229 ; $ $
)+ 1
!;
# Malarvizhi v United India Insurance Co. Ltd., (2020) 4 SCC 228 1
! ;(,$
$ 1S Vishnu Ganga v Oriental Insurance Company Limited, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 182$
J ))
1 1
!;
$ : ?
1 # K $(-2)-,)) ##8+6LF
)8MN O
# $(-2)0,- ##8/.LF 8M$ O;
( ,LF ).-2-- ##K #)++6MP
-12- ).
1Malarvizhi (supra)$7 % # ;H: )998')996 )999'-222
-222'-22)
H )0 % #
; : -226'-229 ! 1
1
!;$ !:$
$
$ 1
! =
; : $
:
' $
:$
1 & % #
$
: Shivaleela v Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., 2025 SCC OnLine SC 563J Q)+
1O;
1 # K $-2--
##K #)++6$ "
$
$
>
R1 # K $(-229,)+
##8)2$# H
7A : )966
"
'
"
> "
$
-13- "
$ :
H
&3 *! 0
!"
/ ! *
0"
A ! * / !
J +,&(1&)4 = DA 1&-7! !/
! 2 0 ! !
0 4DA 1&-7 !
/!& +,&'
/<& +,&(
A *
!
! ! ,&,'+,&'<&,<+,&( * !
0
!
/
;
<&,<+,&(%
/0<&,<+,&(*
! !
A !
+,&(1&) &- ! ! 0 !
0
/
0 * 0
/ =
₹
! + '( 8-+214 * = EE
%> D/* 7G 0
₹ *= +, '8-(, 4 *
E > %D/ E! 7 * ! =! ₹ !! +, (,,214 *
E> 7 &8 !
! *
0
* / !
*
/ * /'( 8 &8
-14- !
E !/
/! '( /
"
/!>60 $ Shashikala & Ors. v.
Gangalakshmamma & Anr., LawFinder Doc Id 658691 *A I / ! ! ! /
0 = /
/
/ A !Shashikala's case 4
7
E1
$ )/ / )9/)
).
)- -22/$ .0 $0 -6
" ./
.0 $ % # " .0
).
; )/$6-$+)2*'(; )$-2$)/0*'!)., +, E
*/ / !
/
0 ! /
/!
= '( ;
0&' !&< * +& 0 * !
!D * !
DA /
* !
! / * 0 * ! !
! * ! * ;
/ !
-15- / 0 ++ *! * *0>60 $ 0!"
/
10"
* $
10"
* ! /
/
* &3,&+,&3 !
/
10" 2
1 Sr.
No.
Heads Compensation Awarded &
+, (,,21 + 9+(:
( &+(214+(:!+, (,,7 < @
*
A &2' ) ',(214+( )+(F&2'7 '
&8 ++,214+( )+(1) ',(7 (
&'
)
@ <+ +- 8),214&8 ++,F&+F&'7
!D &- &(,21 - DA
&- &(,21
! & 8< ),,21
'- ',,A+ $
'- ',,A& E
'- ',,A& &, "4,+ "3*,49"#
5)-<=< > && &'$%49"#
* 00
5) < < > &+ #;,#%&'
,3"$#4
5) -< < > -<=< < < +< $! 0>60 $ Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma
R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
= 0$*!&3& "$!4 ,5&5
<
10" /
-1698: ! !! /!
! I +'
1
! /* *0 * !
* ! ! ! "
/0 ! /*
!
10" 0 0 * &3,&+,&3
10" !
0 =
0 25.
The statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited by the appellantInsurance Company at the time of admission of the appeal, is ordered to be refunded to them.
+)
/ 4 7 !
!
) )
0
H =/21 =/ $ =/ H 0 J 2%