Satnam Singh @ Satpal Singh v. State Of Punjab




    
 
 

 





 
  

 ! "#

 $ %&'

 

# (

 )*+  ,-)

 
) - 
   

     !

 "      . / -0 #$ "   "  %  &  "

$'

(&) "!   *)" +, 


-    ! '  

(



 .

( ( '

    /(% )

'0 1)
2 (( 

    33        ") '(  )

  45 + +!6    

 3"(    + 6  !1)    ! 0"$ 1)2

  

  

  03"(   2  "  6 (  (!(

"') ) 37) (' 6 3  ) )'

    (  3"(    "(

 +7)     "  6  

$'$ ) 0

#25  
 8 $( 

)( ) 3 +      )'3  

   )  "  6 

%  ! 

! (  ! 



 

"

  PREETI 2021.11.13 13:02 I attest to the accuracy of this document

 )+)+12341+5351 +5+ That being so, without making any comment on the actual merits of the case, whatsoever, since the investigating agency itself does not require the custodial interrogation of the petitioner, this petition has in fact been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.

However, if the petitioners' custodial interrogation is required at any stage hereinafter, in the context of the FIR in question, he would be given 10 days notice before arrest, duly shown to be served upon him.

Naturally, if the complainant is aggrieved in any manner, of lack of proper investigation, she would be always at liberty to avail of her remedy as per law.

/) - 
0  


 
"  6 " % 9" %

$9




 

 

 PREETI 2021.11.13 13:02 I attest to the accuracy of this document