Tarannum Bano @ Tarannum & ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No. 17414 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 28, 2018.

Tarannum Bano @ Tarannum and another ......PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for Mr. J.S.Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ramandeep Sandhu, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab for respondents No. 1 to 4.

None for respondents No. 5 to 12.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned State counsel submits that petitioners have made a statement before the police that they do not apprehend any danger to their lives and liberty at this stage. However, as and when, they apprehend danger to their lives and liberty, they can move application before the police and requisite action as required be taken.

In view of submissions of learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to move application before the police as and when so required. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) September 28, 2018.

JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2018.10.03 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document