(O&M) Nirmal Singh v. Tara Singh And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No..408 of 1991 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.09.2018 Nirmal Singh ... Appellant Vs.

Tara Singh and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. K.S.Cheema, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. G.S.Nagra, Advocate for the respondents.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Mr. G.S.Nagra, learned counsel for the respondents informed the Court that parties have compromised the matter. Mr. K.S.Cheema, learned counsel for the appellant feigned ignorance with regard to the aforementioned fact as his client has not contacted him.

In view of the aforementioned fact, no useful purpose would be served keeping in appeal pending. Dismissed in default with liberty to the parties to revive the appeal in case something survives therein. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 05, 2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2018.09.06 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh