High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/16609/2017allowed

Vinayak Sood v. State Of Punjab

2018-03-08Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

CRM-M No.16609 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.16609 of 2017 Decided on: 08.03.2018 Vinayak Sood ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present :

Ms. Rubai J. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Samina Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for the complainant.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral) The petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.138 dated 28.04.2017 registered under Sections 120-B, 177, 406, 417, 380 IPC at Police Station Focal Point, District Ludhiana. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner in pursuance of the order dated 11.05.2017, has joined the investigation.

Counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Dharampal, has not disputed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation. It is further submitted that a cancellation report has also been submitted on 21.02.2018 before the trial Court.

Counsel for the complainant, on the other hand, has submitted that the matter has been compromised and CRM-M No.49577 of 2017 praying for quashing of the FIR on the basis of the compromise has already been filed before this Court and the same is Mohd. Yakub 2018.03.09 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M No.16609 of 2017 pending for 21.03.2018.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 11.05.2017 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 08.03.2018 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Mohd. Yakub 2018.03.09 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh