Pawan v. State Of Haryana

-1Crl. Misc. No. M-16603 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-16603 of 2015 Date of decision: 26.05.2015 Pawan ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Mehta, DAG, Haryana.

PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) Instant petition under Section 438 o the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.94 dated 28.02.2014 registered under Section 379 IPC at Police Station Palam Vihar, Gurgaon. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is on bail in case FIR No.373 dated 14.04.2014 registered under Section 379 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present FIR. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that besides FIR in question three other cases of stealing vehicles like TATA Safari and other luxury cars are also pending against the petitioner. RAVINDER SINGH 2015.05.27 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2Crl. Misc. No. M-16603 of 2015 Keeping in view that petitioner appears to be habitual offender, no ground for grant of concession of anticipatory bail is made out.

Dismissed.

(Paramjeet Singh) Judge May 26, 2015 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.05.27 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document