Harmohan Singh Sethi v. Municipal Committee, Patiala Etc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA No.2182 of 1994 (O&M) Date of decision:-22.10.2018 HARMOHAN SINGH SETHI ....APPELLANT...

V.

MUNICIPALITY PATIALA AND ANR.

....RESPONDENTS...

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

Present:

None.

**** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) None has appeared on behalf of the appellant even on second call.

On 28.04.2017, the following order was passed:- "Counsel for the parties were neither present on the last date of hearing nor today. Even the notice issued to the appellant has been received back with the report that he is not residing at the given address, whereas, notices issued to respondents No.1 and 2 have been received back served but no one appears on their behalf.

Let fresh notices be issued to appellant as well as respondents for 09.11.2017."

As per the report of the Registry, appellant is not residing at the given address.

Instant appeal is dismissed in default.

22.10.2018 (AJAY TEWARI) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No whether reportable:

Yes/No SONIKA 2018.10.23 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh