Kamaljit Singh & ANR v. Punjab State Agri. Board & ANR

(328) 2023:PHHC:069958

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8347 of 1996 Date of decision : 15.05.2023 Kamaljit Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

Punjab State Agricultural Board and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Joy Preet Meelu, Advocate and Mr. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Maanipur, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 have since been retired from service, the questions with respect to their promotions have been rendered inconsequential. For last two dates, the petitioners were unrepresented. Today also same is the situation.

In view of the above, present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructous.

However, in case the petitioners or their legal representatives may feel that they have a sufficient reason to seek revival of the writ petition, liberty is granted to them to move an appropriate application. May 15, 2023 (Pankaj Jain) Anjal Judge Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2023.05.16 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement