High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/17693/2016dismissed

Nisha Talwar v. State Of Haryana

2016-07-12Mr Justice Rajiv Sharma2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-17693 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-17693 of 2016 Date of Decision: 12.07.2016 Nisha Talwar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 142 dated 24.3.2016, registered under Sections 323, 365, 376, 511, 34 IPC, Police Station Sadar Thanesar, District Kurukshetra.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was not named in the FIR nor the prosecutrix had named her in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and only two persons were named namely Sonu and Neeraj. Counsel further states that the girl has given an affidavit in favour of the petitioner.

Petition has been opposed by the State counsel. The State counsel urges that eight FIRs have been registered against the petitioner and she was indulging in flesh trade and the young girls were picked up and son of the petitioner is also named and she is still in the same trade and her son is absconding.

GURPREET SINGH 2016.07.16 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-17693 of 2016 -2A perusal of the order passed by the Court below shows that the State counsel had referred to the number of FIRs registered against the petitioner. The allegations are that the petitioner was indulging in flesh trade. In the present case, a young girl was picked up when she got down at the Pipli Bus Stand. She was talking on the phone when two persons forcefully made her board a vehicle. There were two other boys who tried to commit rape. When she resisted she was beaten up and thrown in the bushes. With the help of passerby, she made a call to the police. The petitioner has been named by the co-accused. It is at her behest the girls were picked up. The son of the petitioner is also named and is absconding. The allegations are serious. No case for anticipatory bail is made out.

Petition is dismissed.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE July 12, 2016 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2016.07.16 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh