Gurmit Singh v. State Of Punjab Etc.

CRM-M-1678-2014 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1678-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 22, 2015 Gurmit Singh ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Jagjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.

Mr.Abhinashi Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.

.......

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that Ajit Singh @ Jit Singh (since deceased)/injured/aggrieved person has three legal representatives, namely, Tarlochan Singh, Rajinder Singh and Gurdev Kaur. Tarlochan Singh is respondent No.2 while the remaining are residing in England. MEENU 2015.12.23 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-1678-2014 (O&M) -2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to move an application for revival of the present petition after the remaining legal representatives of Ajit Singh @ Jit Singh (since deceased) visit India.

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the above prayer.

Ordered accordingly.

December 22, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.12.23 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh