Sonu v. State Of Haryana




    
       Date of decision: 17th July, 2015  Sonu  Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana  Respondent         !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Bijender Dhankhar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana with ASI Ram Lal.

 !
"#  $ Allegations against the petitioner Sonu in this regular bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.160 dated 04.03.2015 registered at Police Station City Palwal under Sections 170/171/420/467/468/471 IPC are that on 04.03.2015 he was found to be wearing police uniform of National Security Guard (NSG) and on the basis of his statement has led to recovery of a blue coloured beacon light along with shoes and socks of NSG uniform. The lone contention of learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Bijender Dhankhar, Advocate that the petitioner is in custody since RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.17 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   04.03.2015 and that the investigation is likely to take long time to accomplish, could not be controverted by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ram Lal, Police Station City Palwal. Keeping in view the nature of allegations and the incarceration already undergone by the petitioner, impels this Court to allow bail to the petitioner in the present case. Accordingly, he is ordered to be released on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly. # %&'('')!*+,($ -.,' -/0"  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.17 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court