Subhash Chander Kundra Alias Katty v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12888-2022 Date of decision: 08.04.2022 Subhash Chander Kundra @ Katty

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others .....Respondents



   





       

****    

       

                               ! " #$ %   "  %& '

     

  &"  %  ()  *! ! * !+,  !-( "
.

 /     (0 (( * ( 12 
03  $  4 4 %    '

    4    *( (( * (  $/  $       $  &"  (+,  **6  %  - (  (6  
   .    

 
4  %      + '

         4       4

"    4  4     

"                &"  (+,  **6  %  - (  (6  
   .    

 
4  %  7     + '

 

PARVEEN KUMAR 2022.04.21 06:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-12888-2022 /2/     $       $ &"         /          

       8  8  

    /  8

           

    &"   $     (0 (( * ( 12 
03  $  4 4 %  5   '

           8               / 4  "    .        9   4/   /    :

     $ 448       

 #;$4 2 .      / 4   <

 =   "   <  1 *(,3(* %.. ,*   4   "21. Turning to the first point, we are of the considered opinion that the issue is no more res integra. In Narmada Bai Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. (2011) 5 SCC 79, in paragraph 64, this Court restated that it is trite law that the accused persons do not have a say in the matter of appointment of Investigating Agency. Further, the accused persons cannot choose as to which Investigating Agency must investigate the offence committed by them. Paragraph 64 of this decision reads thus:- >64. ..... It is trite law that accused persons do not have a say in the matter of appointment of an investigation agency. The accused persons cannot choose as to which investigation agency must investigate the alleged offence committed by them."
"  8   $     /         /  $  / 

08.04.2022    

 

/ 
? @

 B@ ? $4A B@ PARVEEN KUMAR 2022.04.21 06:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document