Harpreet Kaur And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRWP No. 2900 of 2021 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. 2900 of 2021 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.3.2021 ...

Harpreet Kaur and another ................Petitioners vs.

State of Punjab and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Petitioners in person with their counsel Mr. R.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate.

Mr. J.S. Ghuman, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No. 1 to 3.

Mr. Impinder Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 9 ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Jagtar Singh - respondent No.4, who is present in person with his counsel Mr. Impinder Singh Dhaliwal, has been allowed to meet his daughter Harpreet Kaur - petitioner No.1 in the Court. Counsel representing respondent No.4 states that respondent No.4 would not interfere in the marital life of the petitioners. Under the circumstances, the petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 - the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sahib, to look into representation Annexure P-5, assess threat BANITA CHUGH 2021.03.25 15:51 I agree to specified portions of this document

CRWP No. 2900 of 2021 -2perception to the petitioners and if he finds that some action in the matter is warranted, then the needful be done in accordance with law. However, this order shall not validate the marriage between the petitioners and shall not have any effect on any civil or criminal action to which the petitioners may be found liable under the law. ( H.S. Madaan ) 25.3.2021 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2021.03.25 15:51 I agree to specified portions of this document