Shiv Charan Chaudhary And Others v. Ishwar Singh Naib Tehsildar And Others

165D In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh C.O.C.P. No. 581 of 2022 Date of Decision: 02.05.2022 Shiv Charan Chaudhary and Another ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Ishwar Singh, Naib Tehsildar and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Narinder Singh Behgal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent No.1 to 3.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

Complaining the violation of judgment and decree passed on 08.05.2014, which was corrected on 18.10.2019, the petitioners have filed this petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1971 Act"). The Additional District Judge has decided the property dispute between the parties. The petitioners complain that the aforesaid order, passed by the High Court, has not been properly implemented by the authorities in the revenue record. 2.

If the authorities have failed to implement the order passed by the Civil Court, the petitioners have a remedy of filing another suit. The Civil Court had decided the dispute between the private parties. The revenue authorities are required to implement the same in the revenue record. In case of any failure, the petitioners have a remedy before the Civil Court. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.05.04 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

C.O.C.P. No. 581 of 2022 3.

In view of the above, no ground is made out to exercise the jurisdiction under the 1971 Act. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge May 02, 2022 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.05.04 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document