Dharam Pal v. State Of Haryana Through The Secy. And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH ***** CWP-5576-1998 Date of decision : 03.02.2017 Dharam Pal
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Keshav Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. P.K.Mutneja, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
KULDIP SINGH J. (ORAL) Fresh notice issued to the petitioner has been received back with the report that he is not residing at the given address. In the circumstances, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to revive the same, if so desire. A copy of this order be sent to the petitioner at his address given in the petition.
(KULDIP SINGH) 03.02.2017 JUDGE adhikari Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether Reportable :
Yes/No Virendra Singh Adhikari 2017.02.08 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh