Rajinder & ORS v. State Of Haryana & ORS

CRM-M-17003-2015(O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17003-2015(O&M) Date of Decision: September 21, 2015 Rajinder and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Ms.Savita Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioners.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she would be satisfied if the Station House Officer of Police Station Madlauda, District Panipat, is directed to file the report under Section 173, Cr.P.C., in the present case after perusing the document, Annexure P8 and other relevant documents showing that the petitioners were in possession of the land in dispute. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station, MEENU 2015.09.22 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-17003-2015(O&M) -2Madlauda, District Panipat, to file report under Section 173, Cr.P.C., in the present case after perusing the document, Annexure P8, and other relevant documents, to be produced by the petitioners to show that they are in possession of the land in dispute.

September 21, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.09.22 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh