High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/1707/2017disposed of

Sunil Kumar v. State Of Punjab

2017-11-30Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1707-2017 Date of decision: 30.11.2017 Sunil Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

*****

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present:- Mr. J.S. Khiva, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab.

Ms. Sheena Khanna, Advocate, for Mr. H.P.S. Ishar, Advocate, for the complainant.

JAISHREE THAKUR, J.(ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 100 dated 24.12.2016 under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC, registered at Police Station City Mansa, District Mansa.

During the pendency of the instant petition, the matter was referred for mediation which has been successful. In terms of the said compromise arrived at between the parties a sum of Rs. 6.5 lacs is to be paid by the petitioner to the complainant as full and final settlement and the parties herein are supposed to file a petition for grant of divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Heard.

Since the matter has been compromised, the interim bail Satyawan 2017.12.02 14:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-1707-2017 -2granted to the petitioner by order dated 19.01.2017 is made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation; will not leave India without permission of the Court and will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 30.11.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned yes Whether reportable No Satyawan 2017.12.02 14:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh