High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/17132/2017allowed

Ganesh v. State Of Haryana

2019-02-20Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

CRM-M No.17132 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.17132 of 2017 Decided on: 20.02.2019 Ganesh Dutt ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present :

Mr. Vineet Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral) The petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.195 dated 17.04.2017, registered under Sections 120-B, 420, 423, 465, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Ganaur, District Sonepat.

The operative part of the order dated 16.05.2017, vide which interim anticipatory bail has been granted to the petitioner, is reproduced as under:- "....Notice of motion returnable on 24.07.2017. In the event of arrest, petitioner shall be released on ad interim anticipatory bail in FIR No.195 dated 17.04.2017, registered under Sections 120-B, 420, 423, 465, 467, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, at Police Station Ganaur, District Sonepat, on furnishing of his bail MOHD YAKUB 2019.02.20 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M No.17132 of 2017 bonds amounting to ` 10,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. Petitioner is directed to join the investigation as and when required and fully cooperate with the Investigating/Arresting Officer."

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in pursuance to the order dated 16.05.2017 and the order dated 15.12.2018, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has joined the investigation.

Counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Umesh Tyagi, has not disputed the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and subsequently, he has also rejoined the investigation and is no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, this petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 16.05.2017 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 20.02.2019 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2019.02.20 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh