Ranjit Singh v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-17080 of 2015 Date of Decision: 11.8.2015 Ranjit Singh --Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Punjab --Respondent.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Additional A.G. Punjab.
**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 33 dated 24.2.2015 under Sections 420/411/465/468/467/471 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Kulgarhhi, District Ferozepur.
Notice of motion was issued and interim protection was granted.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Satnam Singh, submits that despite having been granted two opportunities and having served notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C., petitioner has not joined the investigation. He prays for dismissal of the present petition.
AMIT KUMAR 2015.08.12 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Criminal Misc. No. M-17080 of 2015 Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has specifically informed the petitioner that he was duty bound to join the investigation in compliance of the orders dated 25.5.2015 and 31.7.2015 passed by this Court. Thereafter, he received no instructions from the petitioner whether the petitioner has joined the investigation or not.
In view of the above undisputed fact that petitioner has not joined the investigation, despite having been granted two opportunities, petitioner has not been found entitled for the concession of anticipatory bail.
In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner would be a compulsive necessity of the investigating agency, so as to carry out an effective investigation. No case for anticipatory bail has been made out. Dismissed.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 11.8.2015 Ak Sharma AMIT KUMAR 2015.08.12 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document