Gurpiar Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others
"#$%&%"
%'() $(*)# #+,#-% .# % $'%#-"
/
8 99 01 8 / /254256(7
8 99 01 8 / /24:6256(7
8 99 01 8 / /265:3256(7
8 99 01 8 / /2;3256(7
!
8 99 01 8
<= /2>625(7
- - ?6315615
!
8 99 01 8
?
1
@' A 1@
1% A@ 99/2342561
1,9 A@ 99/2542561
1!1 1'
A@ 99/24:62561
1#@!
A@
1@ 1!A@ 99/265:32 561 - 1 11
A@ 99/2;32561
1,9 A@ 99/2>6251
1* -99A@ @ /2342561
1 111,9A@ 1
1 B9A @ #166 636/234256 #1;66/2542 561
1 A@
1%1'1 A@ #1A46A3 4A>A35A3;6A;34A6AAA4A:A45:5A:3 :A>6A>;A>A>4656A6565>A666A66A66;66: 65/2342561
1
!
9 A A 1 CCC
<3=
61 , A 99 D 9 99 9 1$ E /2342561 A $ 99 156156A 9 9 , A 9 9 ,
F
9 9 '9 - @ 1 31 / 9 99 9 9 9 ,
9 9 %G9 '
!"! # "!$%&!'(")*)+ ,+-1" 9@ 9 @ 9 99 H45G 9 '9 - @ - 9 ' 9 1 @ A
9 9
A 9 A 9
A
I 9 9 9
@ H-$G 9 9 1 % @ 9 9 ;16156A 9 -$
9
1% 9 -$ @ 9 9
<;= 9 1 / 9 9 9 , 9 E ;16156A - 99 A -$ 9I 9 - @ 9 9 9@ 9 9 -$1 / 9
9
9 9 561 16156156
9 @ I 9 99
;161561 / 9
E - 9 9 @ 56A @
99 99 99 1"@ A -$ 9 9 @ 9 9 @ 1 / 9A A 9 9 , 1$ 99 9 91 ;1 A 9 9 J
'
9
1$ 9 9 ,
-@,
9 @ 9 A / 0A @ E
<= - @ 1 99 99
A
9 @ 9 9 99
D
9
1$ -$ 9
@1$ 99 @9
-$A 99 99 A A 9 @ 1 "@ A @9 -$ 1/ 9 9 9 A 9 99 99
91 $ @ 9
E 9 A A '
1 " 99 @ A @9 9 -$ 9 9 1 2 9 - A -$ 9 I 9
@ E -$1 &@ 9 @ A A E -$
1"
9
<= 516156 - 99 @ 9 9 9 9 99
D @9 @ 9 1 $ @ 9 9 -$ 9 E A 9 9 E -$1$ 9
- 516156 9 9 ;16156 9 9
9 '9 - @ 99 E
9 1 " 9 9 @ 2 -$A
9
1 1 B @ 1 1 $ ' 9,
!"! A 9 9 $ (
# ""
'.$/$'"!
)**,0 12)99 1% @ A$ (
9 %G9 D'
""
'.3$# (4 !!$/ 5! 26-+ 0 ))*A E A 99 D'
?2 No doubt it is a salutary principle not to permit the State or its instrumentalities to tinker with the "rules of the game" insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria is concerned as was done in C. Channabasavaih v. State of Mysore [AIR 1965 SC 1293], etc. in order to avoid manipulation of the recruitment process and its results. Whether such a principle should be applied in the context of the "rules of the game" stipulating the procedure for selection more particularly when the change sought is to impose a more rigorous scrutiny for selection requires an
<4= authoritative pronouncement of a larger Bench of this Court. We, therefore, order that the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India for appropriate orders in this regard." 41 %@ 9 A 9 A 9 9 A ' 9, A9 ?2
! "# $
# % &
# $
'
$ '
"
# '
(
)
* $
# ! +, -./
$
% # * .
% # * .
#
% & - ./
# % & ,
!
# #/ '
$
#
$0 # $ '
#/
#
<:= 1"'
$
#
# $#
# $2
'
$ ! 34 #
, %
$
# $
' %
$ # $ $
5
6 :1 *
9 #1 A A A 9 9 9 9
9 9 9
9 @
D
9 9 9 9
@9 9 6; ' "1 >1 $E @ 9 9 %G9 D'
A D E @ -$A -$ I 9
9 9 91 % @ A 9 - - @ -$ 9 1"9E E -$1 651 B 9 9 E -$1$ A -$ 9 99
9 9 9
<>=
@ 9
@ 9 99E 991 $ A 9 99 A 9 9 6; ' "9 @K I 99 99GA 1 661 "@ E @ 9 #1 A 9 A99 9
1$ 9 991 # @ -$1"9 99J
@9 A 1 61 " A 9 E 99
9 1$ 9 9 $ (
@ @ %G9 '
!"! @ 99
9 9 , 1 $ 9 9 1 631 99 19 9 1
78
78 6315615
61B EJ L ? . J# 1B 9 L ? . J#