Satpal And Others v. State Of Haryana




    
        ! Date of decision: 10th July, 2015  Satpal and others  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana  Respondent  "  #$  %
  %
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Amardeep Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana

 %
& $! Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.144 dated 30.03.2015 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak under Sections 498A/406/323/354/377/506/34 IPC. Vide order dated 08.06.2015 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioners were directed to join investigation and were granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/IO concerned.
Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Azad Singh, Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak, submits that the petitioners RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.13 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



  have since joined the investigation and are no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from them and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 08.06.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioners will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly.

 %
!   '()&    RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.13 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court