Brij Lal v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-18072-2018 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18072-2018 Date of decision: - 15.05.2018 Brij Lal .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present:- Mr. Navneet Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Malik, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ajay Arora Bharti, Advocate for the complainant.

**** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) for grant of concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.108 dated 31.07.2017, under Sections 326, 195, 182, 201, 120-B, 34, 211 and 182 IPC, registered at Police Station Baragudha, District Sirsa.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in terms of order dated 01.05.2018, the petitioner has joined the investigation on 09.05.2018 and his custodial interrogation is no longer required in this case.

Naresh Kumar 2018.05.15 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-18072-2018 -2The above factual position is duly acknowledged by learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Kamal Singh, by submitting that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required any more. In view of above, the interim order dated 01.05.2018 is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and the present petition stands disposed off. ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) May 15, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reportable?

No Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Naresh Kumar 2018.05.15 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh