Tasawar v. State Of Haryana
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......
(1) Criminal Misc. No.M-1741 of 2017 .....
Date of decision:27.7.2017 Tasawar
...Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana
...Respondent
....
(2) Criminal Misc. No.M-2486 of 2017 .....
Jabbar alias Baru
...Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana
...Respondent
....
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....
Present:
Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Chetan Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.
.....
Inderjit Singh, J.
This order will dispose of the above mentioned two petitions filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.545 dated 29.6.2016 registered for the offences under Sections 307, 332, 353 and 186 IPC; Section 25 of the Arms Act and Section 13(2) of HGS & GS Act, 2015 at Police Station City Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. Harpal Singh Parmar 2017.07.28 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Cr. Misc. Nos.M-1741 of 2017 etc.
[2] Notice of motion has been issued in these cases. Mr. Chetan Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested these petitions.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondentState and have gone through the record. Petitioner-Tasawar is stated to be in custody since 3.7.2016 and petitioner-Jabbar alias Baru has been in custody since 3.10.2016. The present is no injury case. Both the petitioners are in judicial custody and they are not required for any interrogation and investigation purposes. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioners in custody till the final disposal of the case. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present cases; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the cases, these criminal miscellaneous petitions are allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds in the sum of `50,000/- each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
July 27, 2017.
(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes Whether reportable:
No Harpal Singh Parmar 2017.07.28 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh