Shilak Ram v. State Of Haryana And ANR




    
       Date of decision: 14th September, 2015  Shilak Ram

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Shailender Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 !
"#  $ Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Shilak Ram in case by way of Criminal Complaint No.6 dated 04.02.2014 under Sections 427/34 IPC read with Section 3(1)(iv) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 pending in the Court of ACJM, Rohtak.

It is submitted that in compliance of the orders dated 26.05.2015 of this Court, petitioner Shilak Ram has surrendered RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.15 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    before the trial Court and has been allowed bail, in support of which contention certified copy of the order dated 02.06.2015 passed by the ACJM, Rohtak has been placed on record by learned counsel for the petitioner.

In the light of what has been stated above, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 26.05.2015 is made absolute and the petition stands disposed off accordingly subject to compliance under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

#  !
$   !%&'%()%*"  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.15 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court