High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/17523/2017allowed

Rajpal & ANR v. State Of Haryana

2017-11-14Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-17523 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1.

CRM-M-17523 of 2017 Date of Decision: 14.11.2017 Rajpal and another ....Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent 2.

CRM-M-29772 of 2017 Lalit ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Gurmohan Singh Bedi, Advocate for petitioners in CRM-M-17523-2017.

Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-29772-2017.

Mr. Deepak Grewal, DAG, Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Present petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioners in case FIR No. 67 dated 17.03.2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 325, 506, 452 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), at Police Station Farrukhnagar, District Gurugram. Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioners have joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is no more required for the purpose of further investigation of the case. He further submits that the police has deleted the offence punishable under Section 452 IPC vide DDR Jitender Kumar 2017.11.14 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-17523 of 2017 -2dated 10.06.2017 and now other offences which remain in the FIR are under Sections 323, 325 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, these petitions are allowed and orders dated 17.05.2017 and 18.08.2017 are made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

November 14, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.11.14 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH