Radha Kishan v. Hari Kishan And ORS.

RA-RS No.32 of 2019 (O&M) in -1 - RSA No.1639 of 1994

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-RS No.32 of 2019 (O&M) in RSA No.1639 of 1994 Date of Decision.30.04.2019 Radha Kishan ..Appellant Vs Hari Kishan (since deceased) through LRs and others

...Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate for the review applicant-respondent No.1.

-.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) The applicant-respondent No.1 under the garb of changing counsel is making an attempt to re-agitate the issue, which is not the scope of the review as the ingredients of Section 114 and Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not envisage such grounds. There has to be an error apparent on the face of record, which has not been brought to the notice of this Court, much less, it tantamounts to re-agitate the points which have been raised and addressed, in view of the ratio decidendi culled out by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Tamilnadu Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees Association Vs. S.K. Roy, The Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation of India and another" 2016 (9) SCC 366. The review petition is dismissed.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE April 30, 2019 Pankaj* Whether Reasoned/Speaking Yes Whether Reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.05.01 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document