Chetan Oberoi v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17681-2014 Date of Decision: February 09, 2016 Chetan Oberoi .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Sunil Sihag, Advocate for Ms.Diya Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned proxy counsel for the petitioner states that he has the instructions to pray for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to take all the pleas before learned trial Court at appropriate stage in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the above prayer.

Ordered accordingly.

February 09, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.02.10 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh