Bijender Alias Sonu v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No. 17720 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 17720 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.10.2017 ...

Bijender @ Sonu ................Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Pratham Sethi, Advocate for the complainant. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Arguments heard, during the course of which learned State counsel has submitted that prosecution would conclude its evidence within a period of three months from today. Let it be so done. The trial Court is directed to make earnest efforts to ensure that the remaining PWs are summoned and examined within such time frame.

Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner Banita Chugh 2017.10.24 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M No. 17720 of 2017 -2states that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

A copy of the order be sent to the trial Court for information and necessary compliance.

A copy of the order be also given to the State counsel under signatures of the Special Secretary of the Court, in order to enable him to take up the matter with prosecution agency to comply with the order.

( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 24.10.2017 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2017.10.24 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh