Maman Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-22161-2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-22161-2011 Date of Decision: February 27, 2016 Maman Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Lal Singh Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Arun Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Sumeet Goel, Standing Counsel for CBI, for respondent No. 11.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral):

Learned counsel for the State on instructions from SI Khila Ram of Police Station, Civil Lines, Karnal, submits that under the orders of Director General of Police, Haryana, Panchkula, the investigation of the present case has been entrusted to the State Crime Branch, Haryana. A copy of the communication in that regard, has been handed over to learned PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.27 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-22161-2011 counsel for the petitioner.

After going through the said communication and receiving instructions from the petitioner, who is present in the Court, learned counsel does not press this petition at this stage. Ordered accordingly.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE February 27, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.27 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document