Jitesh v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-17773 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-17773 of 2017 Date of Decision: 23.05.2017 Jitesh ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr.Tajender Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 469 dated 24.11.2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 379-B read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code (for short, "IPC") at Police Station Udyog Vihar, Gurugram.

Heard.

Notice of motion.

On asking of the court, Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice and submits that intimation by Registry informing of fixation of the petition has already been received and record of the case is available with her.

As per case of prosecution, petitioner-Jitesh had given lift to Amit and Sandeep upto Shankar chowk and dropped them there. Both the above named snatched Innova car from complainant alongwith articles lying in the vehicle. The police has presented challan against the petitioner under Section 120-B IPC.

Jitender Kumar 2017.05.23 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-17773 of 2017 -2The petitioner was arrested in this case on 03.12.2016. Learned State counsel submits that after investigation challan has been presented against petitioner and charges have also been framed against him. In view of above but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner-Jitesh is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:- (a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh. (c) He shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court.

May 23, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.05.23 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH