Joginder v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-18819 of 2018 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-18819 of 2018 Date of Decision: 23.10.2018 Joginder ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Arun Singal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Priyanka Sadar, AAG, Haryana.

Respondent No. 2 in person with Mr. Anshuman Dalal, Advocate.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 249 dated 28.2.2018, registered under Sections 376(2)(n), 506, 34 IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act, Police Station Panipat City, Panipat.

Complainant is present in person. She states that she had given the complaint on pressure of somebody and she does not press the same. Similar is the response of the police. They say that the complainant has failed to give any material to show that any threat was extended.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 14.5.2018, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the GURPREET SINGH 2018.10.23 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-18819 of 2018 -2investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 14.5.2018 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE October 23, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GURPREET SINGH 2018.10.23 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh