Rashmi Rani And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS




    
     

 Date of decision: 23rd July, 2015  Rashmi Rani and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Vikram Jeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.

None for respondents No.4 and 5.

 "
#$ !% Learned State counsel submits that the boy and girl, both petitioners, have made statements before the police that the threat perception to their life and liberty no more subsists, in view of which the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed having been rendered infructuous.

$  "
%   &'( )#


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.27 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court