Manjit Ram v. State Of Punjab




    
       Date of decision: 20th August, 2015  Manjit Ram  Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab  Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Harshit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

 !
"#  $ Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.8 dated 09.02.2015 registered at Police Station City Dhuri, District Sangrur under Sections 307/341/34 IPC and Section 25, 27 of the Arms Act.

Vide order dated 28.05.2015 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioner was granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.21 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    Learned State Counsel, on instructions from SI Vijay Kumar, Police Station City Dhuri, District Sangrur submits that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 28.05.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly. #  !
$   %&%'( "    RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.21 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court