Krishan Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP No.6246 of 2019 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6246 of 2019 Date of decision:03.10.2019 Krishan Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Ms. Sunita Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Mohd. Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Prayer in present writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to protect the pay of petitioner. Notice of motion.

On asking of Court, Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that petitioner, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide legal notice dated 28.10.2016 (Annexure P-4) within some specified time.

In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into merit of case or commenting thereon, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide legal SAVITA KADIAN 2019.10.15 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.6246 of 2019 {2} notice dated 28.10.2016 (Annexure P-4) or any fresh representation petitioner intends to submit by passing a well reasoned and speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case, legal notice is not decided within aforementioned specified time, there shall be costs of Rs.25,000/- to be paid by the concerned officer to the petitioner.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE October 03, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.10.15 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh