Karnail Singh v. Jitender Kumar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-18036-2017 Date of decision: 09.08.2018 Karnail Singh ..... Petitioner

Versus

Jitender Kumar and another ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Gunjan Gera, Advocate for Mr. FS Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sunil, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that vide judgment dated 18.05.2018, rendered by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Guhla, Criminal Complaint No. 240 of 2013 dated 07.12.2013, filed by the petitioner against the respondents under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC was dismissed and they were acquitted of the charges framed against them.

In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.

August 09, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2018.08.16 12:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document