Jitender @ Shillu v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-18061 of 2017 .....

Date of decision:24.5.2017 Jitender alias Shillu

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parveen Aggarwal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.36 dated 30.4.2017 registered for the offences under Sections 365, 323, 506 and 234 IPC and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act at Police Station Jatusana, District Rewari.

Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Parveen Aggarwal, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition. Police record is also available. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondentState and have gone through the record. The FIR has been got registered by one Dalbir Singh. The main Harpal Singh Parmar 2017.05.25 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-18061 of 2017 [2] allegation is that Bablu and Jitender knocked the door of his house at 9.30 p.m. and they after catching hold of him made him to sit in the car. Then they sped away the car and took him to the wine shop where one boy Ravi also associated them and then they went towards the fields, where his all clothes were got put off and Ravi caught hold of him and made him grounded and Bablu started beating him with sticks, Danda and with fist and kick blows and while calling him `Chamar', he continued saying "Dedh, Chamar". Then again they went to the wine shop and bought liquor and beer. Then all of them returned to the fields and again started beating him. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 1.5.2017. He is no more required for interrogation or investigation purposes.

The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

May 24, 2017.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No Harpal Singh Parmar 2017.05.25 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh