Atul Gupta v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19041-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.05.2026 ATUL GUPTA ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL PresentMs. Prabhjot Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Lal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG Haryana.

Mr. J.S.Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2.

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

2.

Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 3.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(H.S.GREWAL) 20.05.2026 JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.05.21 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh