Gurdeep Singh And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ANR

CRM-M-11027-2025 (O&M) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-10828-2025 in/and CRM-M-11027-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 01.04.2025 Gurdeep Singh and Others .....PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Haryana and Another .

..RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Vishal Sharda, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Ms. Ankita Ahuja, AAG, Haryana.

**** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
CRM-10828-2025
Allowed as prayed for and Annexures P-4 (compromise deed and original Affidavit) and P-5 (copy of challan) are taken on record. Main case 1.

By way of this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.113 dated 29.04.2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 148, 149, 307, 506 IPC, 1860 and Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act(Sections 148, 149, 307 IPC deleted and Section 285, 201, 34 IPC, 1860 added) registered at Police Station Sadar Pehowa, District Kurukshetra, Haryana on the basis of compromise deed dated 27.01.2025 (Annexure P-4), whereby they claim to have settled their differences with respondent No.2.

2.

Notice of motion.
Sonia Puri 2025.04.08 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-11027-2025 (O&M) -2-



3.

Ms. Ankita Ahuja, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State whereas Ms. Mehtab Kamboj, Advocate has put in appearance by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2.
4.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 confirms the factum of the compromise having been effected between the parties and states that respondent No.2 has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question. 5.

Learned State counsel has stated no objection in case the FIR is quashed based upon the compromise. He further states that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

6.

In view of the above, even if this case is taken to its logical conclusion, it would only be an exercise in futility as the parties have already settled their differences, therefore, no purpose would be served in wasting the time and resources of the State in pursuing this case to its pre-ordained end. It would, therefore, be better to give a quietus to the issue at this stage. 7.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No.113 dated 29.04.2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 148, 149, 307, 506 IPC, 1860 and Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act(Sections 148, 149, 307 IPC deleted and Section 285, 201, 34 IPC, 1860 added) registered at Police Station Sadar Pehowa, District Kurukshetra, Haryana, and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom shall stand quashed.
(H.S. GREWAL) 01.04.2025 JUDGE Sonia Puri Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No
Sonia Puri 2025.04.08 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document