Balwinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another
CRM-M-14455-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14455-2021
Reserved on: 29.07.2022
Date of Pronouncement: 15.09.2022
Balwinder Singh
...Petitioner (s)
Versus
State of Punjab & another
...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Shakti Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Kirat Pal Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondent no.2. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No.
Dated Police Station Sections 23.2.2021 Mataur, District SAS Nagar 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 IPC and 24 Immigration Act The petitioner, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person. 2.
During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-3.
3.
After that, the petitioner came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent. 4.
On 30.5.22, the aggrieved person Renu Salotra (R-2) stated before the ACJM, SAS Nagar, Mohali and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 31.5.22, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat.
ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.09.19 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original
CRM-M-14455-2021 ANALYSIS & REASONING:
5.
However, the petitioners did not arraign another aggrieved Atinderpal as a respondent in this case.
6.
Since the victim Atinderpal did not state about his no objection to the compromise and also the reasons which led to the compromise, as such this court cannot proceed further in this matter.
7.
Given above, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file a fresh petition and there would be no necessity re-examine Renu Salotra and the accused, whose statements stand recorded. The copies of the statements alongwith report would suffice. Petition dismissed in the terms mentioned above, with liberty reserved. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE September 15, 2022 AK Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes Whether reportable:
No.
ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.09.19 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original