Kamruddin And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RFA No.6 of 2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2022 Kamruddin and ors.

..Appellant (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and ors.

..Respondent (s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL PresentMr. Ashwani Kumar Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate, Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Advocate for HSIIDC.

Mr. Shailendra Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Satyendra Chauhan, Advocate and Mr. Jagtar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Karan Nehra, Advocate, Ms. Sandeep Kaur, Advocate, Mr. Abhay Josan, Advocate, Mr. Harvinder Thakur, Advocate, Mr. Sushil K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. ML Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Varun Gupta, Advocate, Mr. JS Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Gulshan Nandwani, Advocate, Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the landowners.

Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana and Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana *** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

CM No.15-CI of 2022 For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, the application for bringing on record the legal representative(s) of Yasin (appellant No.2) is allowed, subject to all the just exceptions. The legal representative(s) of Yasin (appellant No.2) are brought on record for the purpose of prosecuting or defending the present appeal only. Main Case For orders, see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA No.2685 of 2021 titled as Surajmal (deceased) thr Lrs. vs. State of Haryana and ors.

All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.

11.07.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No ASHOK KUMAR 2023.01.05 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document