High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRA-AS/148/2023dismissed

Ramphal v. State Of Haryana And Another

2024-12-05Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel17 pages

#&'()*'+,-,(./

77 9/ / %

:::::

"#$%

! ! "

$ !

'();<

+ %

4 %

* *+ "

'' ',( ! ;

3 6 =

/ -

. !

'();<

+ - #

0+-1$

% ! 3

! !

% % %

4 %&

# "

% 3 -

;

'();<

+-> >

< 3

! ! 4

;

; ! % %&

;

4 ' +

*+ ',( %%!

5 - # $%

A % + /

7 ! 2B .

/ % !

; - -B!3

#% $

% !

$ %%

! % !

+ !

3 #

! %

# $ + ! #

*+ !

2 %

-- !

;

! %! 7 %B - - B! A ,,( %% # "

$ !

% -

'();<

+- , = %

! %&

; "

% ! % = %

! % /

%% %

% +

% %

toto.

= %

% 8 %

D;( #$D;#A $

#D;<$ +

D;(D; !

*+ % 8

+-* D;2 9/

,,( 7 % B % % ;

7 % B %

! @

! %! ;

% %

% -

! ! %&

%% +

/ % % % % -

= %

%/ -

!! %&

4 %

! % % % 8 + %&

3 -

% ! ;

% %

! %

/ 3

/ -

!" # $% "39. Thus, it is beyond the pale of doubt that the scope of interference by an Appellate Court for reversing the judgment of acquittal recorded by the trial Court in favour of the accused has to be exercised within the four corners of the following principles:# (a) That the judgment of acquittal suffers from patent perversity; (b) That the same is based on a misreading/omission to consider material evidence on record;

(c) That no two reasonable views are possible and only the view consistent with the guilt of the accused is possible from the evidence available on record.F 3 @ % @

C 3

% 4 %

'();

<+-

'();

+- ; &$%'()"

#* !

+,-* - #.)' Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.

Explanation. For the purposes of this section, "cruelty" means# (a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or (b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand."

'();

+ - #+-$

% %

* %%

'(); @%

3 H%

% !

/ !

% % %% !

% /

% I/

% !

;

3 %

/ !

! -

% %

I % % %

% =

1 !

8 !

% &

% % % %

'() C

+- ; "306 .Abetment of suicide. ─If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment

1 of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine."

3 %

+- ; "107.

Abetment of a thing.─ A person abets the doing of a thing, who─ First. ─ Instigates any person to do that thing; or Secondly.─ Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or Thirdly.─ Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.

Explanation 1.─ A person who by wilful misrepresentation, or by wilful concealment of a material fact which he is bound to disclose, voluntarily causes or procures, or attempts to cause or procure, a thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that thing.

Explanation 2.─ Whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitate the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act." C /

% 3

% -

% %

<+- %

+ &

% % % % ! %

% /

% %

6 %

%% %

<+-3

1 -

/ *

0 1 ) " . 2$23 2 % %%

% / !

+ ! / ; "16.

In cases of alleged abetment of suicide, there must be a proof of direct or indirect act(s) of incitement to the commission of suicide. It could hardly be disputed that the question of cause of a suicide, particularly in the context of an offence of abetment of suicide, remains a vexed one, involving multifaceted and complex attributes of human behavior and responses/reactions. In the case of accusation for abetment of suicide, the Court would be looking for cogent and convincing proof of the act(s) of incitement to the commission of suicide. In the case of suicide, mere allegation of harassment of the deceased by another person would not suffice unless there be such action on the part of the accused which compels the person to commit suicide; and such an offending action ought to be proximate to the time of occurrence. Whether a person has abetted in the commission of suicide by another or not, could only be gathered from the facts and circumstances of each case.

16.1.

For the purpose of finding out if a person has abetted commission of suicide by another; the consideration would be if the accused is guilty of the act of instigation of the act of suicide. As explained and reiterated by this Court in the decisions above referred, instigation means to goad, urge forward, provoke, incite or encourage to do an act. If the persons who committed suicide had been hypersensitive and the action of accused is otherwise not ordinarily expected to induce a similarly circumstanced person to commit suicide, it may not be safe to hold the accused guilty of abetment of suicide.

But, on the other hand, if the accused by his acts and by his continuous course of conduct creates a situation which leads the deceased perceiving no other option except to commit suicide, the case may fall within the four#corners of Section 306 IPC. If the accused plays an active role in tarnishing the self#esteem and self#respect of the victim, which eventually draws the victim to commit suicide, the accused may be held guilty of abetment of suicide. The question of mens rea on the part of the accused in such cases would be examined with reference to the actual acts and deeds of the accused and if the acts and deeds are only of such nature where the accused intended nothing more than harassment or snap show of anger, a particular case may fall short of the offence of abetment of suicide.

However, if the accused kept on irritating or annoying the deceased by words or deeds until the deceased reacted or was provoked, a particular case may be that of abetment of suicide.

2 behaviour, each case is required to be examined on its own facts, while taking note of all the surrounding factors having bearing on the actions and psyche of the accused and the deceased."

C< 3 %

% % %

! % %

<+-

% 4

1 -

% *4(, ) / 5 # ** )363 / !

"21.

The ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 306 of the IPC (abetment of suicide) would stand fulfilled if the suicide is committed by the deceased due to direct and alarming encouragement/incitement by the accused leaving no option but to commit suicide. Further, as the extreme action of committing suicide is also on account of great disturbance to the psychological imbalance of the deceased such incitement can be divided into two broad categories. First, where the deceased is having sentimental ties or physical relations with the accused and the second category would be where the deceased is having relations with the accused in his or her official capacity.

In the case of former category sometimes a normal quarrel or the hot exchange of words may result into immediate psychological imbalance, consequently creating a situation of depression, loss of charm in life and if the person is unable to control sentiments of expectations, it may give temptations to the person to commit suicide, e.g., when there is relation of husband and wife, mother and son, brother and sister, sister and sister and other relations of such type, where sentimental tie is by blood or due to physical relations. In the case of second category the tie is on account of official relations, where the expectations would be to discharge the obligations as provided for such duty in law and to receive the considerations as provided in law.

In normal circumstances, relationships by sentimental tie cannot be equated with the official relationship. The reason being different nature of conduct to maintain that relationship. The former category leaves more expectations, whereas in the latter category, by and large, the expectations and obligations are prescribed by law, rules, policies and regulations.

22.

The test that the Court should adopt in this type of cases is to make an endeavour to ascertain on the basis of the materials on record whether there is anything to indicate even prima facie that the accused intended the consequences of the act, i.e., suicide. Over a period of time, the trend of the courts is that such intention can be read into or gathered only after a full# fledged trial. The problem is that the courts just look into the factum of suicide and nothing more. We believe that such understanding on the part of the courts is wrong. It all depends on the nature of the offence & accusation.

For example, whether the accused had the common intention under Section 34 of the IPC could be gathered only after a full#fledged trial on the basis of the depositions of the witnesses as regards the genesis of the occurrence, the manner of assault, the weapon used, the role played by the accused etc. However, in cases of abetment of suicide by and large the facts make things clear more particularly from the nature of the allegations itself. The Courts should know how to apply the correct principles of law governing abetment of suicide to the facts on record. It is the inability on the part of the courts to understand and apply the correct principles of law to the cases of abetment of suicide, which leads to unnecessary prosecutions.

We do understand and appreciate the feelings and sentiments of the family members of the deceased and we cannot find any fault on their part if they decide to lodge a First Information Report with the police. However, it is ultimately for the police and the courts of law to look into the matter and see that the persons against whom allegations have been levelled are not unnecessarily harassed or they are not put to trial just for the sake of prosecuting them.

1 -

% /%

% 4 -

! ( D

% %

% !

+ !

;

3 %

% %

% ! %

4 !

! % %

',( +

%% % %

* D; B .

2 %

/ #I@;$ 4 8

/ ',( ,<

#I@;'$8

D;2 9/

% "

' %8 ! %

% "

' 3 7 % B

* D;< + / %

% %

! 2 ',(

3 % % 4

3 !

D;( #

$ D; A #

$ %

<+-D;(#

@ ;

/ (

)

3 !

% %

* D; #

$% # $ %

% !

@ ;

! %%

@ ;

8 ! /

< +

< &

8 % ',( ! %

) !

% !

3 8

D;(D; !

4 3 !

) !

< +- 7

D;( D; /

<+-3

8 %

! ! % % %

@ ;

% ! % !

% 8 @

! +

/ !

3 @

@ ;

! 3 %

! %!!

! 8

D;<+/ 3 ! *= B

* % @

+ !

! %

% @

@ % %

% /

! %

/% ;

/ % % / %

6 % %

8 %

3 %

% % % %

% % %

+% 4 !

% %

! %&

% / %

+ !

% 4

! %

! 8

/ %

! @

%% % !

% % %

6 %% %8

< 3 8

<+- %

% %

% 8

3 %

% %

+ %

0 %

E %

% % !

% @

< +- 3

E %

% % % % %

% !7

'();

+- 3

D; B! .

- #IL;$ +/

3 %% 4

% % !

3 % %

+ %

% ' + % % % %

! !

%8 % , 3 %

% %

@ %

% @ 3 -

! %

! !

8 !

% %

% % 3 4

/ % 4

C %

, ' Ajay D 8 6 6"

D 6"