Sudama Wanti And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 2890 of 2022 Date of Decision: 31.03.2022 Sudama Wanti and another .......... Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Amarpreet S. Bathindewala, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, by filing the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, are seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of a mandamus, hence directing respondents No. 2 & 3 to give protection to the life, and liberty, of the petitioners, and against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondent Nos. 4 & 5.

2.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to the respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-3. 3.

Consequently, this Court directs the respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-3, through a speaking order.

4.

The petition is disposed of, accordingly.

5.

A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

March 31, 2022 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2022.03.31 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document