Rambir Yadav v. Deepak Goyal

2024:PHHC:058384 [262]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-826-2024 Date of Decision : 29.04.2024 Rambir Yadav

...Petitioner

versus Deepak Goyal ....Respondent Coram :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT Present :

Mr. T.S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate and Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for Ms. Baani Chhibber Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent.

*** RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (ORAL) 1.

This is a contempt petition filed under Sections 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for punishing the respondent for disobeying the order dated 20.01.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP No.1259 of 2024.

2.

Counsel for the respondent submits that the order dated 20.01.2024 has been complied with and speaking order dated 29.02.2024 has been passed. Copy of the order dated 29.02.2024 produced by the counsel for the respondent in the Court today, is taken on record. Registry is directed to scan and tag it at an appropriate place. 3.

Counsel for the petitioner has not even disputed the aforesaid fact.

RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.04.30 05:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2024:PHHC:058384 COCP-826-2024 -24.

In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed, as such.

5.

However, if any grievance of the petitioner is left un-redressed, he would be at liberty to raise the same in any other alternate remedy, but in accordance with law. (RAJBIR SEHRAWAT) JUDGE 29.04.2024 'R. Sharma'

Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.04.30 05:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document