Laval Kumar & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ANR
Date of decision: 21st September, 2015 Laval Kumar and others
Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
Respondents ! " " 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Gurveer Sidhu, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
"#$ !% Report dated 08.07.2015 of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Baba Bakala Sahib, District Amritsar has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Janak Raj as well as the accused persons namely Laval Kumar, Kuldeep Kumar and Prem Nath, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine and has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.21 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
Heard.
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure money dispute, the fact that parties belong to the same very village and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of heinous nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in &'()"')*+,"-(-.
/)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3
$4% $3'5')(6% 4 and &7/68')2.3 "')*+ ()2 -+.39 , "-(-. /)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3
: $% $3'5')(6%
# the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.50 dated 19.08.2014 registered at Police Station Matewal, District Amritsar Rural under Sections 420/120:B IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed.
The petition stands allowed in those terms.
$ "% ".;-.51.3 #
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.21 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court