Isapak v. State Of U.T Chandigarh

       



 !"# $%&%!'( )*)

+, -) %%!' .

/ .&0& +))  )))) &1!'# '

( 23+)+ 3 










 




 
!

"#
 


$  34)536 %
&






'
()*

 &
+,
'

,
'
-.-*




 
/






012
+ %-)

.3 %% -.-3


' *%45-6
*%)5(6
**)
**75*6
*(.5-6
7%5-6


&
+&&
' -.-*
 /8 &


&

'
*%)5(6
9
7%5-6 +'
-.-*


'
&/
:



-










 

 



  





:


:& ; 
'
/&
::

 


 

2 %7.4..<
 
#



/,
;


012

*

=
 






 
/
&
:











 



;
 





  

/

/
 



&

/ 










:



  




₹3...<

%.>
::

 


/&

 :

;
 /:






/&


 


: 




 &

%( %% -.-3
':&


  

&
/



/
/&
 



 



-3 .* -.-7



 






: ?



?


/
:?
 

%%
 

& .-

/
#:
;
 /:




 






&


;
 
 /:
 


,


:

 


 


 
/ 
/&
, 
:
/

/











/


(

=
 





 &

 



,



;

:&





&



/
/&
 /:



::
/&




 

 







/

;











: 






&



;


 





 
 












  &



:

.(
:




 :

?


?


/
:?
 

%%

 

&
.-

/
#:?
  

& /



/
/&
 



 

 


:&
,


:

 

 


 
/ 
/&

:

 
 &
;
 



  

 



/
 



  
  /






-%


 

1

Reliance is placed upon a judgment in the case of Dataram Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh &Anr. 2018(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 131, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has held that keeping somebody behind the bars, till his guilt is proved, for an indefinite period amounts to infringement of her right to life and liberty, as enshrined under Article 21 of Constitution of India and is against the principle "bail is a rule" and "jail is an exception".

@

1



/












/


/


 
/ /< &
/







 <"

&

<A


1






 /
 


# 

 


:




 5 36 .7 .( -.-7  

 6 B
 ,<C D<+ 6 B
 /C D<+