Amit Leela v. State Of Haryana

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision:07.02.2022

  ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
 

     

  

   

 

  ! ***** AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (ORAL) ase heard via  

Vide this petition, the petitioner seeks the concession of 'anticipatory bail' under the provisions of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., upon FIR no.188, dated 23.12.2017, having been registered at Police Station Kalka, District Panchkula, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC.

The petitioner having been ordered to be admitted to interim bail upon joining investigation (if he was sought to be arrested), vide an order dated 12.03.2020, thereafter on 04.10.2021 the following order had been passed by this court (co-ordinate Bench):-

-2- "! #  

   

  

   $    %  &  

 &   '( )* ()()  )+ ), ()('

 %  #

#



 #%    

    )+ ), ()('

 

 - .  /  %#  &   

  %    
   . 0

      )+ )( ()() $# 12 #

#%  

    /

 % 

#  - . & &    



  
   . !&  #%  

    &

  /   1  & - 

3  



.   #  # 

   !     %    1 

4

 1/   '' ') ()('


 



 


#   '' )) 

- - .  

 

/  

  

 -

5 
#  

  & 



- .   

 /

       

 %  #

4 &

 


 4  (, )' ()(( -

  # Today learned State counsel submits, on instructions from SI Mukesh of Police Station Kalka, that in fact a cancellation report has been prepared in

-3November 2021, with the allegations against the petitioner having been found to be unfounded.

Consequently, &#

  

  #

   the petition is allowed, with the order dated 24.01.2022 made absolute on the same terms and conditions.

3#

  

    

 

 

    &#  %  & 

%  

    



& February 07, 2022 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) dinesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No