Kamaljit Kaur v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-18708 of 2017 [ 1 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-18708 of 2017 Date of Decision : October 04,2017 Kamaljit Kaur..................................................................Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab............................................................. Respondent Crl. Misc. No. M-20267 of 2017 Hardeep Singh .............................................................. Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another ...................................... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL ...

Present:

Mr. Lakhwinder Singh Mann, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Priyanshu Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

...

LISA GILL, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of CRM-M-18708-2017 as well as CRM-M-20267-2017. For the sake of convenience, facts are extracted from CRM-M-18708-2017.

The petitioners in both the cases seek the concession of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 28 dated 30.04.2017 under Sections 406,498-A IPC registered at Police Station Bassi Pathana, District Fatehgarh Sahib. It is informed that during the pendency of this petition the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties before the Mediation Rupinder Kaur 2017.10.06 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-18708 of 2017 [ 2 ] & Conciliation Centre of this Court on 18.07.2017. The Settlement/Agreement dated 18.07.2017 is available with the file of CRMM-18708-2017. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that his client has no objection in case these petitions are allowed subject to strict adherence by the petitioners to the terms and conditions of settlement. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Ranjit Singh, Police Station Bassi Pathana, District Fatehgarh Sahib, verifies that the petitioners have joined investigation pursuant to interim orders passed by this Court.

There is no allegation that the petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts before the learned trial Court, if released on bail. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, specifically the settlement between the parties, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is considered just and expedient to allow these petitions. Consequently, order dated 24.05.2017 passed in CRM-M-18708-2017 as well as order dated 31.05.2017 passed in CRM-M20267-2017 are made absolute. ( LISA GILL ) 04.10.2017 JUDGE rupi Note: Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable:

Yes / No Rupinder Kaur 2017.10.06 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document